Publication:
Shorter time to begin of QRS fragmentation predicts non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-ischemic heart failure patients

Placeholder

Departments

Organizational Unit

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Celikyurt, U.
Açar, B.
Karauzum, I.
Karauzum, K.
Agir, A.A.
Vural A.

Editor & Affiliation

Compiler & Affiliation

Translator

Other Contributor

Date

Language

Embargo Status

N/A

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

El inicio rápido de la fragmentación del QRS predice la no respuesta a la terapia de resincronización cardíaca en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca no isquémica

Abstract

Objective: cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)is an effective option in the treatment of patients with heart failure and wide QRS. Presence of fragmented QRS (f-QRS)on 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)has been shown to be associated with non-response to CRT. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether onset of fragmentation (Q-f interval)is important for CRT response. Methods: this is a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 38 non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients (18 men, mean age 63 ± 12 years)with f-QRS on 12-lead ECG who underwent CRT. Duration of fragmentation, ratio of f-QRS duration to the total QRS duration (f-QRS/t-QRS ratio)and time interval from Q wave to the onset of QRS fragmentation (Q-f interval)were measured. Results: the baseline clinical, echocardiographic findings of patients with responders (24 patients, 63%)and non-responders showed no statistically significant difference, except for longer f-QRS duration, increased ratio of f-QRS duration to the total QRS duration (f-QRS/t-QRS ratio)and shorter time interval from Q wave to the onset of QRS fragmentation (Q-f interval)in patients not responding to CRT. In multivariate analysis, Q-f interval was determined as an independent predictor of response to CRT (OR 1.240, 95% CI: 1.049-1.467, P =.012). In ROC curve analysis, the best cut-off value for Q-f interval to predict responders was 32.5 ms with a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 85.7%, respectively (AUC 0.899, 95% CI: 0.797-1.000, P =.001). Conclusions: shorter time from onset of QRS to beginning of fragmentation is a simple ECG marker to predict non-responsive patients to CRT.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier

Subject

General and internal medicine

Citation

Has Part

Source

Revista Clinica Espanola

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.rce.2018.11.008

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

1

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details